Thursday, February 5, 2009

When Are Exams Over?

This evening, I learned that the exams my daughters wrote last week, will not be returned. For the sake of maintaining the security of the exams, which I presume will be used again and again, exam-writers will never see how their responses were graded.

Am I alone in shaking my head at this reality?

Why I Dislike Exams


Too often, exams test 'facts' which any student would be able to find via Google.

Too often, exams are completed only with paper and pencil.

Too often, exam results comprise a significant proportion of a student's final grade.

Too often, exams are most stressful to those least likely to benefit from the experience.

Too often, exams are ineffective in their attempts to assess learning that took place throughout an entire course.

Too often, the knowledge and understanding demonstrated through exams, cannot be repeated in days following the exam.

Too often, exams test language skills, rather than course specific expectations.

Too often, final grades are the only feedback students get on their exam experience.

Too often, exams measure knowledge and understanding, completely devoid of meaningful context.

I've heard the argument that we need exams to prepare students for university... Yet, in some places policies exist to exempt the very students who might one day have to write post-secondary exams. Are exemptions a way to reward high achievers, or a way to penalize low achievers?

As observant teachers grow in confidence, assessing the learning of their students through rich day-to-day experiences, perhaps the authority long held by written tests, will be gradually diminish...

Photo Credit: Jon Oakley; COCOEN

7 comments:

luciert said...

I really enjoyed your thoughts on exams and full-heartedly agree that conventional pen-and-paper exams are not the way. However, I must speak on behalf of those exams which are either practical or presentation/performance related. I have found exams such as these to be very good at gauging the student's abilities and the knowledge they gained throughout the class. On further note, they are also likely to actually receive full feedback on their exams from the teachers. In some cases, they will even be able to receive said feedback along with a mark at the end of the exam instead of waiting and taking on undue stress. I vote for this as an option to replace exams with. :)

Seani said...

I fully agree with you. If a student is not allowed to see and learn from the exam how meaningful can it be? I have too often seen the knowledge and understanding that cannot be repeated a few days later. We recently had the chance to meet with a specialist to learn "easy" ways to get our students to perform better on the tests. I kept thinking of learning vs. testing and what a waste of money it was in these times.

Kimberly said...

I do not have the opportunity to allow my students to see their final exams in my class, as they've moved on, but I'm happy to show a student her exam if she should come see me and ask to see it.

I think your questions about exemptions are well-put.

Rodd Lucier said...

I think part of the problem is that we tie exams as the END of the course, rather than an opportunity to demonstrate learning, and to reflect on how effectively we've met the expectations of a given course.

I agree with you Tim, If we were to design opportunities from scratch, for students to demonstrate their learning and achievement, I'm sure we could do better than written tests.

Knowing that local boards now schedule exams over 4 or 5 days, matching the number of periods of the day; teachers could theoretically take as much of the day as they'd like to complete a performance assessment.

Sean and Kimberly, If exams have to be the final event, do you think we could see more effective use of the flex days between semesters to provide students with meaningful feedback?

Ross Isenegger said...

I love exams the way I love Euchre. I have been able to beat most people at both games!

François Rivest said...

Most exams aren't made to be part of the learning and evaluation process. Thanks for that article! I shared it with a couple of colleagues!

Jac Calder said...

Great post! I agree with the comments that an exam as an "exit" assessment certainly restricts any benefits to learning. I also agree with Ross, that succeeding on exams often depend on how well a student plays "the game". Although, i've never seen Ross play Euchre, I have seen the math team in action playing Wizard a few summers back and was scarred for life. :)
I think exit/debrief meetings with the teacher should be mandatory (for high school courses, not Wizard).